Filtration · Disinfection · RO · Safe Drinking Supply

Water Filtration System for Drinking —
Municipal & Community Supply.

We assess source water type, turbidity, TDS, microbial load, and daily demand before specifying a single component. The treatment train we design for your community follows your actual source water conditions — not a fixed product list. We configure each water filtration system for drinking water supply around your source water type, daily demand, and applicable national standard.

CoagulationMultimedia FilterActivated CarbonRO MembraneUV Steriliser
Established
2016
Certifications
CE · ISO 9001 · ASME*
Factory Area
70,500 sqm
Workshop
21,000 sqm
Techs / Engineers
78 / 28
Export Markets
20+ countries

*available on request for applicable pressure vessel components

System Configuration Packages

Which of these sounds like your community water project?

Three pre-engineered configurations matched to the most common community water sources. Find the description that fits your site — then request the full specification from our engineering team.

Scenario M-1

Rural community on borehole or well water

Groundwater source — iron, fluoride, or hardness issues

  • Well or borehole is the source — not a river or canal
  • Water looks clear but tastes metallic, stains surfaces, or causes health concern
  • Community of 100 to 5,000 people needing safe drinking water
What we do to your water:
Remove iron, manganese, or fluoride → Filter fine particles → Kill bacteria and viruses → Store → Distribute
This matches my project

After you submit — an engineer reviews within 24–48 h. No complete water analysis required to start; send available data and we will identify missing tests before final design.

Scenario M-2

Community on river, lake, or canal

Surface water — turbid or seasonal quality variation

  • River, lake, or canal is the source — water turns brown or turbid after rain
  • Algae, organic load, or seasonal turbidity spikes cause supply problems
  • Treatment must handle high variation in source water quality
What we do to your water:
Coagulate and settle turbid water → Filter → Kill bacteria and viruses → Store → Distribute
This matches my project

After you submit — an engineer reviews within 24–48 h. No complete water analysis required to start; send available data and we will identify missing tests before final design.

Scenario M-3

Community water tastes salty or brackish

Inland brackish groundwater — TDS above drinking standard

  • Borehole water is salty, bitter, or fails WHO drinking water standard
  • Community is inland — no access to fresh surface water
  • Standard filtration alone will not fix salinity — desalination is needed
What we do to your water:
Pre-filter → BWRO desalination to remove salt → Adjust pH and taste → Kill bacteria → Distribute
This matches my project

After you submit — an engineer reviews within 24–48 h. No complete water analysis required to start; send available data and we will identify missing tests before final design.

Not sure which scenario fits? Describe your project in a few sentences below — our engineers will confirm the right configuration and respond with a site-specific proposal.

Community Water Treatment Train

From source water to safe drinking — the community water filtration system for drinking supply.

The treatment route depends on your source water type. Groundwater requires iron and pathogen control. Surface water adds coagulation and sedimentation. Brackish groundwater adds membrane desalination. Each stage has a defined function and a defined failure mode if omitted.

01CoagulationAlum / PAC · turbid source
02Multimedia FilterTurbidity ≤ 1 NTU · SDI < 5
03Activated CarbonChlorine · taste · organics
04RO MembraneHigh TDS / salinity — BWRO review
05UV Steriliser30–40 mJ/cm² · 4-log bacteria
06Storage TankBuffer volume
07DistributionCommunity supply
StageKey Operating ParameterEngineering Consequence if Undersized / Omitted
Coagulation (OPT)Match coagulant dose to source turbidity and pH; jar test before commissioning.Without coagulation, high-turbidity surface water (50–300 NTU) clogs multimedia filter within days of a rain event — not within months.
multi media filterTurbidity ≤ 1 NTU at outlet; SDI < 5 before carbon and membrane.Turbidity above 1 NTU entering the UV chamber shields pathogens; UV dose below design is delivered without any alarm.
industrial activated carbon water filterChlorine below 0.05 mg/L before RO membrane; EBCT minimum 10 min for free chlorine.Polyamide RO membrane oxidises progressively under chlorine — salt rejection falls within weeks and membrane requires early replacement.
RO membrane (OPT — high TDS / salinity source)50–75% recovery; reject volume and disposal planned before commissioning.Where source TDS or ionic content causes taste, scaling, or regulatory exceedance after filtration alone, membrane treatment is evaluated after full ionic analysis.
uv disinfection water treatmentValidated dose at design flow; inlet turbidity must be ≤ 1 NTU; no residual protection in distribution — chlorination strategy reviewed separately.Turbidity shields pathogens from UV; the effective dose reaching each organism drops below the inactivation threshold without triggering any alarm.

The pre-treatment standard for turbidity control is separate from the membrane pre-treatment standard. A community RO system requires SDI < 5 at the membrane inlet, achieved through multimedia filtration and activated carbon upstream. The UV steriliser requires turbidity below 1 NTU at its inlet to deliver the specified dose — these two requirements must both be met by the pre-treatment train. Where surface water organic load or colour is high, an ozonator for water treatment may be evaluated as pre-treatment oxidation ahead of filtration.

Source water type determines treatment depth

Groundwater routes: iron and manganese removal → multimedia filtration → UV. Surface water adds coagulation and sedimentation before multimedia filtration. Brackish groundwater adds RO after pre-treatment. The right equipment for a clean borehole at 300 mg/L TDS is materially different from a river intake at 200 NTU seasonal turbidity — we size each after confirming your source water data.

Sizing a community system from daily demand

Community water demand typically ranges from 50 to 150 litres per person per day for basic supply. A village of 500 people at 100 L/person/day requires 50 m³/day treated output — equivalent to roughly 2–3 m³/h continuous flow. Storage sized to 8–12 hours of daily demand provides a buffer against source pump failure or peak morning draw, without requiring the treatment plant to match instantaneous peak flow.

UV disinfection can inactivate microorganisms at the treatment station, but provides no residual protection in storage tanks or distribution pipework. Community drinking water systems with storage and pipeline distribution should include residual disinfectant (chlorine or chloramine where permitted), sanitary tank design, screened vents, routine flushing, and periodic E. coli / total coliform monitoring according to the applicable national drinking water standard.

Engineering Variables

Engineering variables reference.

These variables determine whether the treatment route is filtration-only, filtration with RO, or filtration with BWRO — and which pre-treatment stages are required for your source water type. For small municipalities and rural communities, a water purifier system for drinking must be matched to source water risk, not a fixed product list.

ParameterTypical RangeEngineering ConsequenceConfiguration Approach
Source water typeGroundwater (borehole/well), surface water (river/lake), or brackish groundwaterSingle most important routing decision; determines whether coagulation, UF, or BWRO is required upstream of filtration.Groundwater: filtration + disinfection. Surface water: adds coagulation + sedimentation. Brackish: adds BWRO after pre-filtration.
Source water TDS500–600 mg/L is a palatability and scaling review range, not a WHO health-based limitAbove 500–600 mg/L, individual ions (sodium, chloride, sulfate, nitrate, fluoride) may affect taste, cause scaling, or exceed local drinking water limits; membrane treatment is evaluated from full ionic analysis.BWRO reduces TDS to drinking standard; reject volume and disposal confirmed before commissioning — not resolved at installation.
Source water turbidity< 1 NTU groundwater; 10–500 NTU surface water after rain eventsTurbidity above 1 NTU at UV inlet shields pathogens from UV dose; effective inactivation falls below design threshold.Surface water: coagulation + sedimentation + multimedia filter. Groundwater: multimedia filter sufficient for most sources.
Activated carbon EBCT≥ 10 min for free chlorine; ≥ 15 min for chloraminesFree chlorine above 0.05 mg/L degrades polyamide RO membrane; also affects taste at municipal supply chlorine concentrations.ACF mandatory ahead of RO; sized from inlet chlorine concentration and daily throughput.
UV doseValidated dose selected from UVT, rated flow, target organisms, lamp aging allowance, and sleeve fouling. 30–40 mJ/cm² is a common screening reference for bacterial control under favourable UVT conditions.Below design dose, pathogen inactivation falls short; turbid water shields microorganisms from dose without triggering any alarm. UV has no residual protection after treatment; storage and distribution require separate residual disinfection strategy.UV inlet turbidity must be below 1 NTU; UV lamp replacement at 8,000–12,000 operating hours.
Community daily demand50–150 L per person per day for basic supplyUndersized system creates supply gaps at peak morning demand; insufficient storage causes unfiltered bypass during maintenance.Total daily volume sized from population × per-capita consumption; storage sized for 8–12 hours daily output.
Backwash water consumption3–5% of daily treated output per backwash eventRemote sites with limited reject disposal capacity need backwash volume management built into the design.1–2 backwash cycles per day typical; differential pressure trigger more reliable than calendar-based backwash scheduling.
Iron and manganese in groundwaterIron 0.3 mg/L and manganese 0.05 mg/L are common aesthetic / secondary targets; local health-based values and limits may differ — confirm against national drinking water standardIron above 0.3 mg/L stains surfaces red; manganese above 0.05 mg/L causes taste complaints and long-term health concern.Oxidation + contact filtration for iron removal above 0.3 mg/L; confirm analytical results before specifying the oxidation stage.
Fluoride in groundwater< 1.5 mg/L WHO guidelineFluoride above guideline causes dental and skeletal fluorosis with long-term exposure — a common concern in parts of Sub-Saharan Africa, South Asia, and the Rift Valley.Activated alumina or BWRO for fluoride removal; activated alumina less energy-intensive for fluoride-only sites.
BWRO recovery50–75% for brackish community systemsLower recovery wastes treated water — a constraint at water-scarce remote sites where every litre of reject must be accounted for.Set by feed TDS, membrane selection, and available reject disposal capacity at the community site.
Arsenic / nitrate / microbial indicatorsArsenic, nitrate/nitrite, E. coli, and total coliform must be tested for groundwater used in drinking supply; WHO arsenic guideline 10 µg/LClear borehole water can still fail drinking standards due to dissolved contaminants or faecal contamination — appearance is not a safety indicatorSelect adsorption, ion exchange, RO, disinfection, or source protection after full laboratory analysis and local regulation review; do not assume contamination-free from appearance alone
Engineering · Manufacturing · Export

Engineering credentials & export capability.

Founded in 2016, Qingdao Hiju Thermal Power Co., Ltd operates from a 70,500 sqm facility with 21,000 sqm of dedicated production workshop space. Our engineering team comprises 78 technicians and 28 engineers structured to handle full project scope — from design review through factory testing to export documentation.

We hold CE, ISO 9001 and ASME-related manufacturing documentation for applicable pressure-rated components. ASME-compliant components can be supplied on request where project specifications require it. CE and ISO 9001 documentation are commonly requested in international procurement and tender review for community water projects funded by development finance institutions. Final documentation requirements depend on the project specification and funding body.

Our systems have been exported to clients in more than 20 countries and regions, with primary markets in Southeast Asia, the Middle East, Africa, South America and Central Asia. Review our completed engineering projects to verify project type, application and export geography without relying on marketing claims, or browse our full range of industrial water treatment plant solutions by application sector.

Water treatment equipment assembly workshop — community drinking water treatment system production
Project Review Inputs

Submit your water treatment requirements.

Our engineering team reviews each project against your source water type, available quality data, community size, and site conditions before recommending a treatment route and system configuration.

Block A · Water

Water & process inputs

  • Source water type and location — Groundwater borehole, river, lake, canal, or existing municipal supply — source determines treatment route.
  • Water quality data — TDS, turbidity, iron, manganese, fluoride, arsenic, nitrate/nitrite, E. coli / total coliform if tested; full laboratory analysis report preferred.
  • Community population and demand — Number of people served; estimated daily demand; peak demand period (morning draw, irrigation season).
  • Required output quality — Applicable drinking water standard: WHO, national standard, or project specification.
  • Existing infrastructure — Any existing treatment equipment, tanks, or distribution network that will be retained or integrated.
Block B · Site

Site & project inputs

  • Site power supply — Grid, solar, diesel generator; available voltage and amperage; power interruption frequency.
  • Reject water disposal — Available drain or ground discharge for RO reject and filter backwash volume.
  • Site access and maintenance — Distance from nearest technician or service centre; planned maintenance visit frequency.
  • Destination country — Country of installation; applicable national drinking water regulations and import documentation requirements.
  • Project funding and stage — Development finance institution, NGO, government, or private; project stage and procurement timeline.
Request a requirements-based review

For rapid dialogue in Southeast Asia, the Middle East, Africa, or Central Asia, contact our engineering team via WhatsApp or email with your source water data and community population.

For coastal and island communities where the only water source is seawater or a high-salinity coastal bore above the range that BWRO can address economically, our seawater desalination and remote area supply solutions address that scenario with purpose-built SWRO membrane and energy recovery configuration. desalination plant seawater

For municipalities and institutions with pharmaceutical, laboratory, or semiconductor process water requirements within the same facility, our pharmaceutical and electronics ultra-pure water systems address the higher purity specification separate from the community drinking water system. d i water system

Product Hubs

Explore by product category

Every piece of equipment used in the configurations above belongs to one of these six product families. Browse the full range, specifications, and configuration options.

Buyer Questions

Frequently asked questions.

Q.01What is the difference between a water filter and a complete drinking water treatment system?+
A water filter — media filter, cartridge, or carbon — addresses one category of contaminant: suspended solids, chlorine, or taste. A complete drinking water treatment system combines multiple barrier stages: pre-filtration, carbon adsorption, membrane separation, and UV disinfection — this is the core distinction between a point-of-use filter and a complete water filtration system for drinking water supply.
Q.02Does a community water station always need an RO membrane?+
No. For groundwater below 400–500 mg/L TDS with acceptable taste and bacteriological risk managed by UV, operating without a membrane stage is technically appropriate. Above 500–600 mg/L TDS, or where hardness causes scaling in distribution pipework, RO becomes the correct route — the system design is confirmed from source water analysis, not from a water purifier systems for drinking catalogue.
Q.03Why must residual chlorine be removed before the RO membrane?+
Standard community drinking water RO membranes use thin-film composite polyamide construction. Chlorine and chloramines oxidise the polymer matrix of this material, progressively degrading salt rejection. The capital cost of early membrane replacement across the system service life usually exceeds the activated carbon filter capital and operating cost — which is why carbon adsorption ahead of the membrane is mandatory.
Q.04How much backwash water does a multimedia filter consume, and can a small community manage that volume?+
A multimedia filter backwashing at 12–15 m/h for 10–15 minutes consumes approximately 3–5% of daily treated output per backwash event. For a system producing 50 m³/day, that is 1.5–2.5 m³ per backwash conducted once every 24–48 hours. Most sites manage this with a surface drain; remote sites with no drain require backwash recovery or controlled scheduling to be designed in.
Q.05Can the system be expanded as the community population grows?+
Yes, in most configurations. We design community water systems as modular skids where additional parallel trains can be added without replacing existing equipment. The practical expansion constraint is the inlet infrastructure: raw water storage, feed pump manifold, and distribution headers. If these are sized tightly to current demand, expanding the treatment train later requires replumbing the inlet side.
Q.06What source water information is needed before you can design our system?+
The minimum required for a meaningful design review is source water type, quality data, required daily output, target output quality, and site power. TDS and turbidity are the most critical values. Without TDS data, we cannot determine whether a membrane stage is required. If laboratory analysis is not yet available, we can advise on what to test before submitting the inquiry.